Clinton County SSURGO

The following metadata was taken from http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/ssurgo/metadata/clinton_ny.html. The data was downloaded from http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/ssurgo_ftp3.html (login required) and projected from DD, NAD83 to UTM ZONE 18, NAD83. Finally it was clipped to the 10-mile buffer around the Adirondack Park.


Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Clinton County, New York

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1998
Title:
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Clinton County, New York
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Worth, Texas
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

Online_Linkage: <URL:http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/ssur_data.html>
Description:
Abstract:
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information.

This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a 7.5 minute quadrangle format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and nonsoil areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the Map Unit Interpretations Record relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.

Purpose:
SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.

Supplemental_Information:
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be available from the primary organization listed in the Point of Contact.

Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1998
Currentness_Reference: publication date

Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed

Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -74.125
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -73.250
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 45.125
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 44.375

Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: soil survey
Theme_Keyword: soils
Theme_Keyword: Soil Survey Geographic
Theme_Keyword: SSURGO
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Counties and County Equivalents of the States of the United States and the District of Columbia (FIPS Pub 6-3)
Place_Keyword: New York

Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Counties and County Equivalents of the States of the United States and the District of Columbia (FIPS Pub 6-3)
Place_Keyword: Clinton County

Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: USGS Topographic Map Names Data Base
Place_Keyword: Alder Brook Quadrangle (s4407325)
Place_Keyword: Altona Quadrangle (s4407303)
Place_Keyword: Altona OE N Quadrangle (s4507359)
Place_Keyword: Au Sable Forks Quadrangle (s4407335)
Place_Keyword: Beekmantown Quadrangle (s4407313)
Place_Keyword: Brainardsville Quadrangle (s4407416)
Place_Keyword: Champlain Quadrangle (s4407305)
Place_Keyword: Champlain OE N Quadrangle (s4507361)
Place_Keyword: Chateaugay Quadrangle (s4407408)
Place_Keyword: Churubusco Quadrangle (s4407301)
Place_Keyword: Churubusco OE N Quadrangle (s4507357)
Place_Keyword: Clintonville Quadrangle (s4407336)
Place_Keyword: Colchester Point Quadrangle (s4407330)
Place_Keyword: Dannemora Quadrangle (s4407319)
Place_Keyword: Ellenburg Center Quadrangle (s4407309)
Place_Keyword: Ellenburg Depot Quadrangle (s4407302)
Place_Keyword: Ellenburg Depot OE N Quadrangle (s4507358)
Place_Keyword: Ellenburg Mountain Quadrangle (s4407310)
Place_Keyword: Franklin Falls Quadrangle (s4407333)
Place_Keyword: Jericho Quadrangle (s4407311)
Place_Keyword: Keeseville Quadrangle (s4407329)
Place_Keyword: Lyon Mountain Quadrangle (s4407317)
Place_Keyword: Moffitsville Quadrangle (s4407318)
Place_Keyword: Mooers Quadrangle (s4407304)
Place_Keyword: Mooers OE N Quadrangle (s4507360)
Place_Keyword: Morrisonville Quadrangle (s4407320)
Place_Keyword: North Hero Quadrangle (s4407314)
Place_Keyword: Peasleeville Quadrangle (s4407327)
Place_Keyword: Peru Quadrangle (s4407328)
Place_Keyword: Plattsburgh Quadrangle (s4407321)
Place_Keyword: Port Douglas Quadrangle (s4407337)
Place_Keyword: Redford Quadrangle (s4407326)
Place_Keyword: Rouses Point Quadrangle (s4407306)
Place_Keyword: Rouses Point OE N Quadrangle (s4507362)
Place_Keyword: South Hero Quadrangle (s4407322)
Place_Keyword: West Chazy Quadrangle (s4407312)
Place_Keyword: Wilmington Quadrangle (s4407334)

Access_Constraints: None

Use_Constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products derived from these data.

This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference source. This is public information and may be interpreted by organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.

Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only. Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.

Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position: State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: Suite #354, Room 520, 441 S. Salina Street
City: Syracuse
State_or_Province: New York
Postal_Code: 13202
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 315 477 6526
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 315 477 6550
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 202 720 7808

Cross_Reference:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: Soil Survey of Clinton County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: text, table, map
Description:
Abstract:
This soil survey contains information that can be applied in managing farms and wetlands; in selecting sites for roads, ponds, buildings, and other structures; and in judging the suitability of tracts of land for farming, industry, and recreation.

Purpose:
This soil survey depicts information about the kinds and distribution of soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.


Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
Attribute accuracy is tested by manual comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system. Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s).

Logical_Consistency_Report:
Certain node/geometry and topology GT- polygon/chain relationships are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements (the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing the limits of the file (neatline) are free of gaps. The tests of logical consistency are performed using vendor software. The neatline is generated by connecting the explicitly entered four corners of the digital file. All data outside the enclosed region are ignored and all data crossing these geographically straight lines are clipped at the neatline. Data within a specified tolerance of the neatline are snapped to the neatline. Neatline straightening aligns the digitized edges of the digital data with the generated neatline (i.e., with the longitude/latitude lines in geographic coordinates). All internal polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e., adjacent polygons with the same label). Quadrangles are edge matched within the soil survey area and edge locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.

Completeness_Report:
A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named the same in terms of their soil and/or nonsoil areas. Each map unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and is uniquely identified. Each individual area is a delineation. Each map unit consists of one or more components.

Soil scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous (nonsoil) areas that have properties and behavior significantly different than the named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they may not be indicated on the map.

Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map units, and location of special soil features. These standards are outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, Soil Survey Staff, 1975, USDA, SCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy, Soil Survey Staff, (current issue); National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI, 1997.

The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit delineations were based on data collected by scientists during the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes, associations, and undifferentiated groups.

Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil. In a consociation, delineated areas are dominated by a single soil taxon and similar soils. At least one half of the pedons in each delineation are of the same soil component so similar to the named soil that major interpretations are not affected significantly. The total amount of dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.

Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations are named for two or more dissimilar components with the dominant component listed first. They occur in a regularly repeating pattern. The major components of a complex cannot be mapped separately at a scale of about 1:24,000. The major components of an association can be separated at a scale of about 1:24,000. In each delineation of either a complex or an association, each major component is normally present, though their proportions may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent.

Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two or more components that do not always occur together in the same delineation, but are included in the same named map unit because use and management are the same or similar for common uses. Every delineation has at least one of the major components and some may have all of them. The same principles regarding proportion of inclusions apply to undifferentiated groups as to consociations.

Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend, one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per 3,000 acres.

A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of about .2 acres.

Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their compilation to base maps that meet National Map Accuracy Standards. The difference in positional accuracy between the soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies with the transition between map units.

For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.

Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1972
Title: multiple photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1972
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photographs were flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS1
Source_Contribution: base material for survey
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricutlural Stabilizatoin and Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 1972
Title: multiple photographs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Salt Lake City, Utah
Publisher:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricutlural Stablization and Conservation Service
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1972
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photographs were flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS2
Source_Contribution: base material for survey
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Serivce
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: Soil Survey of Clinton County, New York
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1
Source_Contribution:
information for soil map unit delineations, special soil feature locations, and data on soil properties
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: publication annotation overlay
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form:
map Source Sclae Denominator: 15840
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:
1995 Source Currentess Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS2
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
final publication negatives used to develop ratioed film positives
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1976, 1981
Title: multiple 7.5 minute ortphoto quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Menlo Park, California
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Ending_Date: 1976
Beginning_Date: 1981
Source_Currentness_Reference: date aerial photography was flown
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS1
Source_Contribution: compilation base map source
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 1964-1993
Title: multiple 7.5 minute topographic quadrangles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Reston, Virginia
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: paper
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1964
Ending_Date: 1993
Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS2
Source_Contribution: source material for county borders
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: unpublished material
Title: soil delienation overlay
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: stable-base material
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1995
Source_Currentness_Reference: final correlation date
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS4
Source_Contribution: scanning source

Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Field procedures for the second order soil survey included plotting of soil boundaries determined by field observations and by interpretation of remotely sensed data. Boundaries were verified at closely spaced intervals and the soils in each delination were identified by traversing and transecting the landscape. Soil scientists described and sampled the soils, analyzed the samples in the laboratory, and statistically analyzed the data. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in March 1995.
Process_Date: 1995
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: ASCS1, ASCS2

Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Ratioed film positives, 1:24000 scale, were made from the final publication negative. Soil map unit delineations and special soil features were manually compiled from the ratioed film positives to an overlay registered to the 7.5 minute orthophoto quadrangles. Errors from map unit boundaries on the aerial photographs were refined, as needed to the orthophoto image.
Process_Date: 1995
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: s: NRCS2, NRCS3, USGS1, NRCS4

Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The soil delineations overlays were raster scanned by Midwest Graphics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin at 250 dpi on an Intergraph Anatech scanner in rlc format. Four control points corresponding the four corners on the 7.5 minute quarangles were used for registration during data collection. The data were sent to the Wisconsin Digitizing Unit, Madison, Wisconsin. The county borders were manually digitized from the 7.5 minute USGS topographic quadrangles in LT4X Version 4.02 on a Sun UNIX Workstation and exported and snapped together using GRASS Version 4.13 and then imported back into LT4X. The special soil features were manually digitized from the digitizing source in LT4X at a resolution of at least 0.01 inch. The raster editing, labeling, edge matching, vector conversion, and editing were done in LT4X Version 4.02. The data were created in North American Datum of 1927. Check plots of the soils and special soil features were reviewed by a soil scientist and cartographic staff at the Wisconsin Digitizing Unit, Madison, Wisconsin and USDA-NRCS State Office, Syrcause, New York. The soils and special soil features were exported to GRASS Version 4.13 using the v.export command. The digital files were exported as a Digital Line Graphic-3 Optional format using the v.out.dlg command. DLG-3 Optional format files were evaluated with the February 1998 ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation AMLs provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas. Upon successful completion of SSURGO Evaluation, the DLGs were rewritten from ARC/INFO Version 7.1.1. The new DLGs were rechecked with the February 1998 ARC/INFO Evaluation AMLs. These new DLGs were processed with the archiving AMLs provided by National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
Process_Date: 1998
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation:
ASCS1, ASCS2, USGS1, USGS2, NRCS1, NRCS2

Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The Map Unit Interpretations Record data base was developed by Natural Resources Conservation Service soil scientists according to national standards.
Process_Date: 1998
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: NRCS1


Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector


Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
UTM_Zone_Number: 18
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9996
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -75.0
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.0
False_Easting: 500000
False_Northing: 0.0
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.61
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.61
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: GRS 1980
Semi-major_Axis: 6378206.4
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 294.98


Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated by a single soil or nonsoil component plus allowable similar or dissimilar soils, or they can be geographic mixtures of groups of soils or soils and nonsoil areas.

The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed delineation map unit. Each symbol is linked to a map unit name. The map unit symbol is also the key for linking information in the Map Unit Interpretations Record tables. The map unit symbols are not carried within the modified Digital Line Graph file; however, they are made available in a companion attribute file. The attribute file links the minor codes in the Digital Line Graph files to the map unit symbols.

Map Unit Delineations are described by the Map Unit Interpretations Record database. This attribute database gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation, agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil. The soil Map Unit Interpretations Record database consists of the following relational tables: codes (database codes) - stores information on all codes used in the database comp (map unit component) - stores information for soil map unit components compyld (component crop yield) - stores crop yield information for soil map unit components forest (forest understory) - stores information for plant cover as forest understory for soil map unit components helclass (highly erodible lands class) - stores the highly erodible land classification for wind and water assigned to the soil map units. Table not populated. hydcomp (hydric component information) - stores data related to the hydric classification, criteria, landform, etc. inclusn (map unit inclusion) - stores the names of soils included in the soil map units interp (interpretation) - stores soil interpretation ratings (both limitation ratings and suitability ratings) for soil map unit components layer (soil layer) - stores characteristics of soil layers for soil map unit components mapunit (map unit) - stores information that applies to all components of a soil map unit mucoacre (map unit county acres) - stores the number of acres for the map unit within a county muyld (map unit yield) - stores crop yield information for the soil map unit plantcom (plant composition) - stores plant symbols and percent of plant composition associated with components of a soil map unit. Table not populated. plantnm (plant name) - stores the common and scientific names for plants used in the database rangenm (range name) - stores the range site names. Table not populated. rsprod (range site production) - stores range site production information for soil map unit components. Table not populated. ssacoac (soil survey area county acreage) - stores the acreage for the county within the boundary of the soil survey area ssarea (soil survey area) - stores information that will apply to an entire soil survey area taxclass (taxonomic classification) - stores the taxonomic classification for soils in the database windbrk (windbreak) - stores information on recommended windbreak plants for soil map unit components wlhabit (wildlife habitat) - stores wildlife habitat information for soil map unit components woodland (woodland) - stores information on common indicator trees for soil map unit components woodmgt (woodland management) - stores woodland management information for soil map unit components yldunits (yield units) - stores crop names and the units used to measure yield

Special features are described in the feature table. It includes a feature label, feature name, and feature definition for each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area.

Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1975. Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Soil Conserv. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 436.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1992. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Soil Surv. Staff, Soil Conserv. Serv.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI. Soil Surv. Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. Soil Surv. Staff, U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 18.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1994. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Data Base: Data use information. Soil Conserv. Serv.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. State Soil Survey Database Data Dictionary. Soil Conserv. Serv.

Detail Description

Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Special Soil Features

Entity_Type_Definition:
Special Soil Features represent soil, nonsoil, or landform features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations (area features).

Entity_Type_Definition_Source:
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. Soil Surv. Staff, U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 18.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Special Soil Features Codes

Attribute_Definition:
Special Soil Features Codes represent specific Special Soil Features. These features are identified with a major code, a minor code, and a descriptive label. The codes and label are assigned to the point or line assigned to represent the feature on published maps.

Attribute_Definition_Source:
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. Soil Surv. Staff, U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 18; U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1993. National Soil Survey Handbook, title 430-VI, part 647. Soil Conserv. Serv.

Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name:
Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Clinton County, New York

Codeset_Source:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service


Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: P.O. Box 6567
City: Fort Worth
State_or_Province: Texas
Postal_Code: 76115
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800 672 5559
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 817 334 5469

Resource_Description: Clinton County, New York SSURGO

Distribution_Liability:
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the Agency regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will warrant the delivery of this product in computer readable format, and will offer appropriate adjustment of credit when the product is determined unreadable by correctly adjusted computer input peripherals, or when the physical medium is delivered in damaged condition. Request for adjustment of credit must be made within 90 days from the date of this shipment from the ordering site.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor any of its agencies are liable for misuse of the data, for damage, for transmission of viruses, or for computer contamination through the distribution of these data sets. The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)

Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: DLG
Format_Version_Date: 19920508
Format_Specification:
Optional Format Content Information: spatial and keys
Transfer_Size: 119.4
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Offline_Option:
Offline_Media: CD-ROM
Recording_Format: ISO 9660 Level 1
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name:
ASCII Format Content Information: keys and attributes
Transfer_Size: 0.8
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Offline_Option:
Offline_Media: CD-ROM
Recording_Format: ISO 9660 Level 1

Fees:
The charge is $50 for a CD-ROM that contains one or more data sets. A data set is one soil survey area in full quadrangle format and includes both spatial and attribute data.

Ordering_Instructions:
Call or write to organizations listed under under Distributor. Spatial line data and locations of special feature symbols are in DLG-3 optional format. Digital line graph files contain major and minor code pairs in area and line records. A conversion legend is provided for each digital line graph file. Soil map symbols and special feature labels are available in a companion ASCII attribute file. The Map Unit Interpretations Record attribute soil data are available in variable length, tab delimited, ASCII file format.

Turnaround: 10 working days


Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 19980713
Metadata_Review_Date: 19980722
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Contact_Position: State Soil Scientist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: Suite #354, Room 520, 441 S. Salina Street
City: Syrcacuse
State_or_Province: New York
Postal_Code: 13202
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 315 477 6526
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 315 477 6550
Metadata_Standard_Name:
Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998


Generated by mp version 2.2.1 on Wed Jan 13 08:25:08 1999